<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Tshin &#187; family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ben.tshin.com/tag/family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ben.tshin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress vs. Movable Type</title>
		<link>http://ben.tshin.com/2007/wordpress-vs-movable-type/</link>
		<comments>http://ben.tshin.com/2007/wordpress-vs-movable-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.tshin.com/2007/wordpress-vs-movable-type/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My sister is back home and we got talking about techy-geeky things and blogs. We took a look at something on her site and she complained about how tacky or boring it looked. I think it was still using the original design style from Movable Type. So being familiar with WordPress and blogs in general [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister is back home and we got talking about techy-geeky things and blogs.</p>
<p>We took a look at something on <a href="http://ruth.tshin.com">her site</a> and she complained about how tacky or boring it looked. I think it was still using the original design style from Movable Type. So being familiar with WordPress and blogs in general I know that it&#8217;s relatively easy to change styles since it&#8217;s all in the CSS. So we find the thing to choose designs and off we go. But for some reason MT messed everything up with the sidebars.</p>
<p>I am my sister&#8217;s tech saviour. I provide hardware (i.e.: <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=183&amp;modelid=14904">Canon PowerShot A560</a>, <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=261">Western Digital Passport 120GB</a>, et al.), software (Windows &amp; Office) and most importantly movies and TV shows (i.e.: <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/uglybetty/">Ugly Betty</a>, Prison Break). So now I am my sister&#8217;s blog saviour.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used MT on my previous blog, and my brother currently [nominally] uses it as well. The gripe is the user interface (or user experience) for MT3.33 is clunky, static and just plain yuck. WP2.3 just seems light years ahead. I feel like a geek to say it, but WP is just better web.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the big issue. The main issue is open source software. SixApart, a for-profit company) is the primary developer of MT. So they took the originally open source MT2.x and made it &#8220;closed source&#8221; for MT3.x. Lots of Movable Type developers fled and created WordPress.</p>
<p>Now look: MT4.x is once again being released as open source (Movable Type Open Source). And now SixApart is playing catch up. Too bad. Movable Type was a pioneer, but WordPress is the new king of the playground. Just don&#8217;t mention Google and Blogspot/Blogger.</p>
<p>So my mini-task for this week: migrate my sister&#8217;s blogs from MT and Blogspot to WordPress. I pray for clear skies and strong tailwinds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ben.tshin.com/2007/wordpress-vs-movable-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

